Electric transmission line ground fault prevention systems using dual, high sensitivity monitoring devices

ABSTRACT

A system for preventing ground fault in a three-phase electric transmission line system caused by a line break, includes: the transmission lines, a programmable relay protection system, including a plurality of relay devices on each line, programmed to include: preset parameter ranges of at least two electric operating conditions, at least one high sensitivity instantaneous undercurrent and at least one high sensitivity condition selected from line differential overcurrent and negative sequence overcurrent (and combinations thereof), the preset ranges being acceptable operating parameter ranges; monitoring; permitting closed circuit operation when all of the lines show that the two operating conditions are within the preset acceptable operating parameter ranges; tripping a circuit breaker on a broken line when that line shows that the two operating conditions are outside the preset parameter ranges; and shutting down power to the broken line before it otherwise causes a ground fault or other short circuit.

REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation-in-part of co-pending U.S. Utility patent application Ser. No. 17/672,422, titled “Electric Transmission Line Ground Fault Prevention Methods Using Dual, High sensitivity Monitoring”, filed on 15 Feb. 2022, by the same inventors herein.

BACKGROUND OF INVENTION a. Field of Invention

High voltage (sometimes referred to as high tension) and other three phase electric transmission systems are prone to failing lines that cause ground faults or other short circuits. Typically, such failures result from breaks in an individual line, connection breaks, object intersection, aging, adverse weather, support structure failure, etc. For example, transmission lines that were built decades ago have aged to the point where conductors (lines) separate from splices, or otherwise break and open with double jumpers and double dead end (DDE) towers. These double jumpers may slap against the steel towers or otherwise ground to cause fires and/or injury to structures, persons, animals and wildlife and flora. In the case of two major 2018 California fires, many homes and entire towns were destroyed by fire caused by ground faults resulting from broken lines.

Historically, the industry has focused attention to preservation of transmission lines, transformers, generators and substations by monitoring systems for shorts and ground faults, reacting according to the concept of best methods for preserving equipment and maintaining best (least interrupted) services to the load (consumers). Thus, for decades and presently, the industry utilizes preprogrammed relays that monitor operating conditions to identify shorts and to shut down electricity on the shorted line and isolate to provide electricity to the consumer. These relays react once a ground fault or other short has occurred. The present invention is directed to a very different approach—the use of methods, devices and systems that focus on identifying a break in a line before a short or ground fault occurs, thereby preventing disasters that may result from such shorts and ground faults. There are about 1.3 to 1.7 seconds between the time a line breaks and the time a short occurs (i.e., the time it takes to touch a foreign conductor, such as ground, tower or building). The present invention is directed to unique systems and devices to see the break in real time within fractions of a second, even milliseconds, and to likewise shut down the line (trip the breaker(s)) within fractions of a second and, hence, before any short occurs, avoid many possible disasters. This is achieved by micro-monitoring, looking at different parameters (operating conditions) from those used in the prior art relays, and reacting nearly instantaneously.

b. Description of Related Art

The following patents are representative of the field pertaining to the present invention:

U.S. Pat. No. 6,518,767 to Roberts et al. describes a power line current differential protection system. All three phase current values (I.sub. A, I.sub. B and I.sub. C) are obtained from both the local end and the remote end of a power transmission line. The magnitude of the ratio of the remote current values to the local current values are calculated. Also, the angle difference between the local and the remote current values for each phase are calculated. Comparison elements then compare the ratio and angle values against preselected values which establish a restrain region in the current ratio plane. Current values which result in the ratio being within the region do not result in a tripping signal for the circuit breaker on the power transmission line, while current values which result in a ratio outside of the region result in a tripping of the circuit breaker. Similar circuitry is used for negative sequence current quantities, with the negative sequence preselected values being set substantially lower to produce a more sensitive response to possible faults in the line.

U.S. Pat. No. 10,197,614 to Benmouyal et al. illustrates the errors that are encountered when using both single-ended and double-ended normal-mode fault location calculations when a fault occurs in a pole-open condition. The disclosure provides systems and methods for accurately calculating the location of faults that occur during pole-open conditions, including single-ended approaches and double-ended approaches.

U.S. Pat. No. 10,340,684 to Sridharan et al. describes how a location of a broken electrical conductor of an electric power delivery system may be detected by monitoring a rate of change of phase voltage and/or a rate of change of zero-sequence voltage at various points on the conductor. Intelligent electronic devices (IEDs) such as phasor measurement units may be used to obtain measurements and calculate synchrophasors. The synchrophasors may be used by a central controller to determine which two continuous IEDs measure rates of change of voltages of opposite polarities, where the broken conductor is between the two continuous IEDs. The synchrophasors may be used by a central controller to determine which two continuous IEDs where one exhibits a zero-sequence voltage magnitude that exceeds a predetermined threshold for a predetermined time, wherein the zero-sequence voltage magnitude of the other of the continuous IEDs does not exceed the predetermined threshold.

U.S. Pat. No. 10,823,777 to Dase et al. relates to detecting a broken conductor in a power transmission line. In an embodiment, a processor receives a signal indicating current on the transmission line. The processor determines that a broken conductor is present on the transmission line based at least in part on a magnitude of the current being less than a line charging current of the transmission line and a phase angle of the current leading a respective phase voltage of the transmission line. The processor effects a control operation based on the determined broken conductor.

U.S. Pat. No. 10,955,455 to Thompson et al. pertains to detection of a broken conductor in an electric power system. In one embodiment, a broken conductor detector may be configured to be mounted to an electrical conductor and may comprise a communication subsystem configured to transmit a signal configured to indicate that the conductor is broken. A sensor may determine an operating vector. A processing subsystem may be configured to receive the operating vector from the sensor and to identify when the operating vector is outside of a range defined by a rest vector and a threshold value. In certain embodiments, the threshold may comprise a three-dimensional sphere. The processing subsystem may determine that the conductor is broken based on the operating vector remaining outside of the range for a period of time determined by the timer subsystem. A signal may be transmitted by the communication subsystem to indicate that the conductor is broken.

U.S. Pat. No. 11,211,788 to Wade et al. describes how systems and methods may mitigate risk of fire caused by an electric power system. In one embodiment, a system may include an intelligent electronic device (IED). The IED includes a communication subsystem to receive a signal from a sensor related to a condition of the electric conductor. A processing subsystem in communication with the communication subsystem may operate in at least two modes comprising a high security mode and a fire prevention mode. In the fire prevention mode, the IED may interrupt a flow of electric current based on the signal from the at least one sensor associated with the electric conductor. In the high security mode, the system may interrupt a flow of electric current based on the signal from the at least one sensor associated with the electric conductor and based on a second condition relating to the electric conductor.

US Publication No. 20190317143 to Gangadhar et al. relates to detecting a broken conductor in a power transmission line. In an embodiment, a processor receives a signal indicating current on the transmission line. The processor determines that a broken conductor is present on the transmission line based at least in part on a magnitude of the current being less than a line charging current of the transmission line and a phase angle of the current leading a respective phase voltage of the transmission line. The processor effects a control operation based on the determined broken conductor.

US Publication No. 20190324074 to Thompson et al. pertains to detection of a broken conductor in an electric power system. In one embodiment, a broken conductor detector may be configured to be mounted to an electrical conductor and may comprise a communication subsystem configured to transmit a signal configured to indicate that the conductor is broken. A sensor may determine an operating vector. A processing subsystem may be configured to receive the operating vector from the sensor and to identify when the operating vector is outside of a range defined by a rest vector and a threshold value. In certain embodiments, the threshold may comprise a three-dimensional sphere. The processing subsystem may determine that the conductor is broken based on the operating vector remaining outside of the range for a period of time determined by the timer subsystem. A signal may be transmitted by the communication subsystem to indicate that the conductor is broken.

US Publication No. 20210048486 to Bell et al. describes systems for determining a broken conductor condition in a multiple-phase electric power delivery system. It has been observed that broken conductors pose a safety concern when occurring in the presence of people or vulnerable environmental conditions. Broken conductor conditions disclosed herein may be used to detect and trip the phase with the broken conductor, thus reducing or even eliminating the safety risk. Further, a distance to the opening may be determined.

US Publication No. 20210091559 to Mobley et al. pertains to detection of a broken conductor in an electric power system. In one embodiment, a broken conductor detector may be configured to be mounted to an electrical conductor and may comprise a communication subsystem configured to transmit a signal configured to indicate that the conductor is broken. A sensor may determine a plurality of vectors. A processing subsystem may be configured to receive the plurality of vectors from the sensor and to identify when the vector is outside of a range defined by a threshold value. The processing subsystem may determine that the conductor is falling based on the plurality of vectors remaining outside of the threshold for a period of time determined by the timer subsystem. A signal may be transmitted by the communication subsystem to indicate that the conductor is falling.

US Publication No. 20210265834 to Wade et al. describes how systems and methods may mitigate risk of fire caused by an electric power system. In one embodiment, a system may include an intelligent electronic device (IED). The IED includes a communication subsystem to receive a signal from a sensor related to a condition of the electric conductor. A processing subsystem in communication with the communication subsystem may operate in at least two modes comprising a high security mode and a fire prevention mode. In the fire prevention mode, the IED may interrupt a flow of electric current based on the signal from the at least one sensor associated with the electric conductor. In the high security mode, the system may interrupt a flow of electric current based on the signal from the at least one sensor associated with the electric conductor and based on a second condition relating to the electric conductor.

Published article 2016 IEEE “Catching Falling Conductors in Midair—Detecting and Tripping Broken Distribution Circuit Conductors at Protection Speeds” by William O'Brien, Eric Udren, Kamal Garg, Dennis Haes, and Bala Sridharan describes how when an overhead electric power distribution circuit conductor breaks—for example, when a car strikes a pole or a splice or clamp fails—the energized conductor falls to ground. The resulting high-impedance ground fault may be difficult or impossible to detect by relays located in the substation. In any case, no ground fault protection relay can operate until well after the time the fault has occurred—after the falling energized conductor has hit the ground and created a hazardous situation. For decades, utilities and equipment manufacturers have worked to develop methods for tripping these hazardous ground faults as quickly as possible. This paper describes a new falling conductor detection scheme that trips the affected circuit section in the narrow time window between the moment of the break and the time the conductor hits the ground. The affected circuit section is de-energized while the conductor is still falling, eliminating the risk of an arcing ground fault or energized circuits on the ground.

Published article 2019 Schweitzer Engineering Laboratories, Inc. “Detecting and Locating Broken Conductor Faults on High-Voltage Lines to Prevent Autoreclosing Onto Permanent Faults” by Kanchanrao Dase, Sajal Harmukh, and Arunabha Chatterjee describes how broken-conductor detection is challenging because the conductor may remain suspended without causing any fault current. Even if the conductor falls to the ground, the fault current might remain low, depending on the fault resistance. For low-resistance faults, a relay can detect faults and trip the line breakers. However, because the relay cannot determine whether the fault is permanent, it may attempt to reclose, causing further stress to the power system. This paper describes a new algorithm that uses only single-ended measurements to reliably detect broken conductors and estimate their location by using the charging current of the line. The phase angle of this current leads the voltage by about ∠90°, and the magnitude is a function of line length. This method is suitable for power lines that have measurable charging current, and it detects broken conductors successfully if the relay can measure the charging current while the conductor is falling in midair. Broken-conductor detection can be used to trip the breakers before the conductor touches the ground and creates a shunt fault. Thus, the algorithm can prevent such faults and block any attempt to reclose the line. Detecting broken conductors and their location information provided by the algorithm can help in quickly resolving broken-conductor faults. This paper presents three field events from 57.1 kV and 220 kV lines and results from Electromagnetic Transients Program (EMTP) simulations that validate the algorithm.

U.S. Pat. No. 9,753,096 to Kim and related U.S. Pat. No. 8,866,626 to Kim both describe a method, system and computer software for detecting an incipient failure of a generator in a power system including the steps of ascertaining one or more generator reference parameter of the generator for use as a baseline reference; measuring one or more operating parameter values of the generator; using the one or more operating parameter values to solve for an estimated present value of the one or more of the generator's current performance parameters using particle swarm optimization technique; and determining whether the estimated present values of the one or more of the generator's current performance parameters are outside of an acceptable limit.

U.S. Pat. No. 7,345,456 to Gibbs et al. describes a stabilizer and synchronous electric power generator system using same that provides both power system damping and excitation limiter functionality. The stabilizer includes a processing unit and a memory storing routines executable by the processing unit. The routines are adapted to receive a voltage signal indicative of a voltage and a current signal indicative of a current output by the generator system, generate, utilizing the voltage and current signals, a power system stabilizer signal for damping oscillations and one or more excitation limiter function signals for controlling excitation level. The routines are also adapted to generate a feedback signal for the generator system by combining the power system stabilizer signal and one or more of the one or more excitation limiter function signals.

U.S. Pat. No. 5,761,073 to Dickson describes a programmable autosynchronizer for use with a system having generator and bus voltages and having a breaker circuit for connecting the generator and bus voltages to each other. The autosynchronizer synchronizes the frequency and phase of the generator and bus AC voltages by controlling the generator voltage. A microprocessor compares the frequencies of generator and bus voltage signals, the microprocessor generating a proportional difference signal having a parameter representative of a proportional difference in frequency between the generator and bus voltage signals. The proportional correction range extends within the synchronization range. The microprocessor permits a sync signal when the frequency difference of the frequencies of the generator and bus voltage signals is within the synchronization frequency range. A first output circuit responsive to the proportional difference signal provides a correction signal to the generator for varying the frequency of the generator. A second output circuit responsive to the sync signal provides a breaker close signal to the breaker circuit for closing the breaker thereby enabling connection of the generator and bus voltages. A frequency correction dead band within the frequency range and a target slip band within the dead band define a zone of limited proportional correction to nudge the generator into synchronization and prevent a hung scope.

U.S. Pat. No. 5,751,532 to Kanuchok, et al. describes a relay for monitoring an electrical system to protect the electrical system from an overcurrent condition as a time dependent function of an electrical current level in the electrical system is disclosed. The relay includes a memory which stores a current level count and a current level detector coupled to the electrical system which detects the electrical current level in the electrical system over time. A microprocessor responds to the current level detector by varying the current level count in the memory as a function of the electrical current level over time. The microprocessor also detects an occurrence of the electrical current level falling below a minimum current level. A timer responds to the microprocessor by measuring a period of time during which the electrical current level is less than the minimum current level. The microprocessor responds to the timer by varying the current level count in the memory as a function of the measured period of time during which the electrical current level is below the minimum current level. A method of monitoring an electrical system to protect the electrical system from an overcurrent condition as a time dependent function of an electrical current level in the electrical system is also disclosed. Other apparatus and methods are also disclosed.

U.S. Pat. No. 5,640,060 to Dickson describes an autosynchronizer for use with a system having generator and bus voltages and having a breaker circuit for connecting the generator and bus voltages to each other. The autosynchronizer synchronizes the frequency and phase of the generator and bus AC voltages by controlling the generator voltage. A microprocessor compares the frequencies of generator and bus voltage signals, the microprocessor generating a proportional difference signal having a parameter representative of a proportional difference in frequency between the generator and bus voltage signals. The proportional correction range extends within the synchronization range. The microprocessor permits a sync signal when the frequency difference of the frequencies of the generator and bus voltage signals is within the synchronization frequency range. A first output circuit responsive to the proportional difference signal provides a correction signal to the generator for varying the frequency of the generator. A second output circuit responsive to the sync signal provides a breaker close signal to the breaker circuit for closing the breaker thereby enabling connection of the generator and bus voltages. A frequency correction dead band within the frequency range and a target slip band within the dead band define a zone of limited proportional correction to nudge the generator into synchronization and prevent a hung scope.

U.S. Pat. No. 5,309,312 to Wilkerson, et al. describes an apparatus for protecting an electrical power system supplying electrical power to an electrical load comprises a transformer for sensing an operating condition of the electrical power system and for producing an analog signal representative of the operating condition, and a microcomputer for periodically sampling the analog signal and for converting the analog signal into a series of digital signals. The microcomputer includes circuitry for deriving a digital value representative of a square root of the series of digital signals and circuitry for processing the digital value over time to determine a processed value which is a function of both the sensed operating condition and time. A circuit breaker is responsive to the microcomputer for disconnecting the power system from the load in the event that the processed value is not within preset limits. The microcomputer also generates a relay signal representative of the status of the relay and the relay includes an output port responsive to the relay signal, for communicating the status of the relay to a remote station.

U.S. Pat. No. 5,014,153 to Wilkerson describes an apparatus for monitoring phased currents in a first winding and a second winding of a transformer and for disconnecting the transformer from a power source supplying the transformer when a difference between the magnitude of the current in the first winding and the magnitude of the current in the second winding exceeds a predetermined amount to indicate a fault condition is disclosed. The apparatus is used in combination with circuitry for generating first and second current signals each having a phase and magnitude which is a function of the phase and magnitude of the phased currents in the first and second windings, respectively. The apparatus includes a circuit for shifting the phase of the second current signal to match the phase of the first current signal, a circuit for detecting a difference between the magnitude of the first current signal and the magnitude of the phase shifted second current signal, and a circuit for disconnecting the transformer from the power source when the detected difference exceeds the predetermined amount.

U.S. Pat. No. 4,788,619 to Ott, et al. describes a protective relay for use in an electrical power system having electrical conductors which are energized with an AC voltage. The protective relay includes a circuit for sensing the AC voltage to produce an AC output that has zero crossings and a time period between zero crossings, a circuit for supplying an electrical signal representing a preselected pickup value of volts-per-Hertz for the relay, and a circuit responsive to the AC output and to the electrical signal for generating an electrical level as a function of both the time period and the pickup value and for producing an output signal for the relay when the AC output exceeds the electrical level. In this way, the output signal is produced when a volts-per-Hertz value of the AC voltage exceeds the preselected pickup value of volts-per-Hertz for the relay. Other protective relay apparatus and methods are also disclosed.

U.S. Pat. No. 4,757,416 to Wilkerson describes a protective apparatus for use in an A.C. electrical power system with a circuit breaker for connecting and disconnecting first and second electrical conductors that are electrically energized, the conductors normally having a negligible phase difference of electrical energization when the circuit breaker is closed, and the circuit breaker having auxiliary contacts defining the state of the circuit breaker as open or closed. The protective apparatus includes a circuit responsive to the auxiliary contacts for producing a first signal representative of the state of the breaker as open or closed and another circuit connected to the circuit for producing the first signal and operable when the breaker is closed for generating a second signal when the phase difference of electrical energization of the first and second electrical conductors exceeds a predetermined value. A further circuit provides an indication of malfunction of the circuit breaker when the second signal occurs. Phase window extending apparatus for use in the protective apparatus, methods of operation and other protective apparatus are also disclosed.

U.S. Pat. No. 6,518,767 to Roberts et al. describes a power line current differential protection system. All three phase current values (I.sub.A, I.sub.B and I.sub.C) are obtained from both the local end and the remote end of a power transmission line. The magnitude of the ratio of the remote current values to the local current values are calculated. Also, the angle difference between the local and the remote current values for each phase are calculated. Comparison elements then compare the ratio and angle values against preselected values which establish a restrain region in the current ratio plane. Current values which result in the ratio being within the region do not result in a tripping signal for the circuit breaker on the power transmission line, while current values which result in a ratio outside of the region result in a tripping of the circuit breaker. Similar circuitry is used for negative sequence current quantities, with the negative sequence preselected values being set substantially lower to produce a more sensitive response to possible faults in the line.

U.S. Pat. No. 10,197,614 to Benmouyal et al. illustrates the errors that are encountered when using both single-ended and double-ended normal-mode fault location calculations when a fault occurs in a pole-open condition. The disclosure provides systems and methods for accurately calculating the location of faults that occur during pole-open conditions, including single-ended approaches and double-ended approaches.

U.S. Pat. No. 10,340,684 to Sridharan et al. describes how a location of a broken electrical conductor of an electric power delivery system may be detected by monitoring a rate of change of phase voltage and/or a rate of change of zero-sequence voltage at various points on the conductor. Intelligent electronic devices (IEDs) such as phasor measurement units may be used to obtain measurements and calculate synchrophasors. The synchrophasors may be used by a central controller to determine which two continuous IEDs measure rates of change of voltages of opposite polarities, where the broken conductor is between the two continuous IEDs. The synchrophasors may be used by a central controller to determine which two continuous IEDs where one exhibits a zero-sequence voltage magnitude that exceeds a predetermined threshold for a predetermined time, wherein the zero-sequence voltage magnitude of the other of the continuous IEDs does not exceed the predetermined threshold.

U.S. Pat. No. 10,823,777 to Dase et al. relates to detecting a broken conductor in a power transmission line. In an embodiment, a processor receives a signal indicating current on the transmission line. The processor determines that a broken conductor is present on the transmission line based at least in part on a magnitude of the current being less than a line charging current of the transmission line and a phase angle of the current leading a respective phase voltage of the transmission line. The processor effects a control operation based on the determined broken conductor.

U.S. Pat. No. 10,955,455 to Thompson et al. pertains to detection of a broken conductor in an electric power system. In one embodiment, a broken conductor detector may be configured to be mounted to an electrical conductor and may comprise a communication subsystem configured to transmit a signal configured to indicate that the conductor is broken. A sensor may determine an operating vector. A processing subsystem may be configured to receive the operating vector from the sensor and to identify when the operating vector is outside of a range defined by a rest vector and a threshold value. In certain embodiments, the threshold may comprise a three-dimensional sphere. The processing subsystem may determine that the conductor is broken based on the operating vector remaining outside of the range for a period of time determined by the timer subsystem. A signal may be transmitted by the communication subsystem to indicate that the conductor is broken.

U.S. Pat. No. 11,211,788 to Wade et al. describes how systems and methods may mitigate risk of fire caused by an electric power system. In one embodiment, a system may include an intelligent electronic device (IED). The IED includes a communication subsystem to receive a signal from a sensor related to a condition of the electric conductor. A processing subsystem in communication with the communication subsystem may operate in at least two modes comprising a high security mode and a fire prevention mode. In the fire prevention mode, the IED may interrupt a flow of electric current based on the signal from the at least one sensor associated with the electric conductor. In the high security mode, the system may interrupt a flow of electric current based on the signal from the at least one sensor associated with the electric conductor and based on a second condition relating to the electric conductor.

US Patent Application Publication No. 20190317143 to Gangadhar et al. relates to detecting a broken conductor in a power transmission line. In an embodiment, a processor receives a signal indicating current on the transmission line. The processor determines that a broken conductor is present on the transmission line based at least in part on a magnitude of the current being less than a line charging current of the transmission line and a phase angle of the current leading a respective phase voltage of the transmission line. The processor effects a control operation based on the determined broken conductor.

US Patent Application Publication No. 20190324074 to Thompson et al. pertains to detection of a broken conductor in an electric power system. In one embodiment, a broken conductor detector may be configured to be mounted to an electrical conductor and may comprise a communication subsystem configured to transmit a signal configured to indicate that the conductor is broken. A sensor may determine an operating vector. A processing subsystem may be configured to receive the operating vector from the sensor and to identify when the operating vector is outside of a range defined by a rest vector and a threshold value. In certain embodiments, the threshold may comprise a three-dimensional sphere. The processing subsystem may determine that the conductor is broken based on the operating vector remaining outside of the range for a period of time determined by the timer subsystem. A signal may be transmitted by the communication subsystem to indicate that the conductor is broken.

US Patent Application Publication No. 20210048486 to Bell et al. describes systems for determining a broken conductor condition in a multiple-phase electric power delivery system. It has been observed that broken conductors pose a safety concern when occurring in the presence of people or vulnerable environmental conditions. Broken conductor conditions disclosed herein may be used to detect and trip the phase with the broken conductor, thus reducing or even eliminating the safety risk. Further, a distance to the opening may be determined.

US Patent Application Publication No. 20210091559 to Mobley et al. pertains to detection of a broken conductor in an electric power system. In one embodiment, a broken conductor detector may be configured to be mounted to an electrical conductor and may comprise a communication subsystem configured to transmit a signal configured to indicate that the conductor is broken. A sensor may determine a plurality of vectors. A processing subsystem may be configured to receive the plurality of vectors from the sensor and to identify when the vector is outside of a range defined by a threshold value. The processing subsystem may determine that the conductor is falling based on the plurality of vectors remaining outside of the threshold for a period of time determined by the timer subsystem. A signal may be transmitted by the communication subsystem to indicate that the conductor is falling.

US Patent Application Publication No. 20210265834 to Wade et al. describes how systems and methods may mitigate risk of fire caused by an electric power system. In one embodiment, a system may include an intelligent electronic device (IED) The IED includes a communication subsystem to receive a signal from a sensor related to a condition of the electric conductor. A processing subsystem in communication with the communication subsystem may operate in at least two modes comprising a high security mode and a fire prevention mode. In the fire prevention mode, the IED may interrupt a flow of electric current based on the signal from the at least one sensor associated with the electric conductor. In the high security mode, the system may interrupt a flow of electric current based on the signal from the at least one sensor associated with the electric conductor and based on a second condition relating to the electric conductor.

Published article 2016 IEEE “Catching Falling Conductors in Midair—Detecting and Tripping Broken Distribution Circuit Conductors at Protection Speeds” by William O'Brien, Eric Udren, Kamal Garg, Dennis Haes, and Bala Sridharan describes how when an overhead electric power distribution circuit conductor breaks—for example, when a car strikes a pole or a splice or clamp fails—the energized conductor falls to ground. The resulting high-impedance ground fault may be difficult or impossible to detect by relays located in the substation. In any case, no ground fault protection relay can operate until well after the time the fault has occurred—after the falling energized conductor has hit the ground and created a hazardous situation. For decades, utilities and equipment manufacturers have worked to develop methods for tripping these hazardous ground faults as quickly as possible. This paper describes a new falling conductor detection scheme that trips the affected circuit section in the narrow time window between the moment of the break and the time the conductor hits the ground. The affected circuit section is de-energized while the conductor is still falling, eliminating the risk of an arcing ground fault or energized circuits on the ground.

Published article 2019 Schweitzer Engineering Laboratories, Inc. “Detecting and Locating Broken Conductor Faults on High-Voltage Lines to Prevent Autoreclosing Onto Permanent Faults” by Kanchanrao Dase, Sajal Harmukh, and Arunabha Chatterjee describes how broken-conductor detection is challenging because the conductor may remain suspended without causing any fault current. Even if the conductor falls to the ground, the fault current might remain low, depending on the fault resistance. For low-resistance faults, a relay can detect faults and trip the line breakers. However, because the relay cannot determine whether the fault is permanent, it may attempt to reclose, causing further stress to the power system. This paper describes a new algorithm that uses only single-ended measurements to reliably detect broken conductors and estimate their location by using the charging current of the line. The phase angle of this current leads the voltage by about ∠90°, and the magnitude is a function of line length. This method is suitable for power lines that have measurable charging current, and it detects broken conductors successfully if the relay can measure the charging current while the conductor is falling in midair. Broken-conductor detection can be used to trip the breakers before the conductor touches the ground and creates a shunt fault. Thus, the algorithm can prevent such faults and block any attempt to reclose the line. Detecting broken conductors and their location information provided by the algorithm can help in quickly resolving broken-conductor faults. This paper presents three field events from 57.1 kV and 220 kV lines and results from Electromagnetic Transients Program (EMTP) simulations that validate the algorithm.

Notwithstanding the prior art, the present invention is neither taught nor rendered obvious thereby.

SUMMARY OF INVENTION

The present invention relates to a system for preventing ground fault or other short circuit in a three-phase electric transmission line system having at least three lines (phases), caused by a break in a line. Thus, the system includes a three-phase electric transmission system having at least three lines and a plurality of circuit breakers, and a programmable relay protection system, including a plurality of communicating relay devices on each line of the electric transmission line system. These relay devices may be newly created or existing but are programmed differently from existing protection relays. Thus, the relay protection system (subsystem) of the present invention ground fault prevention system is programmed to include: a) preset parameter ranges of at least two high sensitivity electric operating conditions, one of which is instantaneous undercurrent, and the other of which is selected from (i) line differential overcurrent, (ii) negative sequence overcurrent, and (iii) combinations thereof, the preset ranges being acceptable operating parameter ranges; b) monitoring means to monitor each line at each of the plurality of relay devices for the at least one operating condition; c) permitting closed circuit operation when all of the lines show the at least two operating conditions are within the preset acceptable operating parameter ranges; d) a tripping mechanism to trip a circuit breaker on a broken line when that line shows the at least one operating condition is outside the preset parameter ranges. The preferred concept is to program the relays to sense the aforementioned condition deviations from the preset parameter ranges, that occur at both broken ends of a broken line, and shut down the power to the broken line, and to do these functions on an extremely rapid basis, preferably under 1.0 second, and most preferably under 50 milliseconds. That is, to complete the monitoring, recognize the break's two change in these monitored conditions sensed to be outside the operating ranges, communicate with breaker(s), and shut down the power, all before the broken line touches a tower, pole or ground.

The present invention ground fault prevention system has a communications system (subsystem) for communications between the relays and the circuit breaker such that when the relay protection system senses an open conductor broken line when the at least two operating conditions fall outside of the preset parameter ranges, communicating to open the circuit breaker on the broken line, thereby shutting down power to the broken line before it otherwise causes a ground fault or other short circuit.

In some preferred embodiments, the present invention system includes sensing open conductor broken line within 0.5 second of the break, when the at least two operating conditions (one of which is instantaneous undercurrent, and the other of which is selected from (i) line differential overcurrent, (ii) negative sequence overcurrent, and (iii) combinations thereof) falls outside of the preset parameter ranges, and before the broken line touches a tower, pole or ground, and, when the relay protection system senses the open conductor broken line monitored conditions on a broken line that is outside of the preset parameters, communicating to open the circuit breaker on the broken line to shut down within another 0.5 seconds, thereby shutting down power to the broken line before it otherwise causes a ground fault or other short circuit, i.e., before one or both ends at the break of a broken line touches a tower, pole or ground.

In some preferred embodiments of the present invention system for preventing ground fault or other short circuit in a three-phase electric transmission line system, the plurality of relay devices on each line is programmed to monitor both upstream and downstream from each of the plurality of relay devices such that when a line is broken, the monitored conditions of both ends of the break is recognized and reported in the system to effect the shutting down power to the broken line by tripping two circuit breakers, one being upstream from the break and the other being downstream from the break.

In some preferred embodiments of the present invention system, the programmable relay protection system relay devices are programmed to monitor highly sensitive line differential overcurrents to detect current imbalance on line-charging capacitive current. In some preferred embodiments of the present invention method, the relay devices are programmed to be highly sensitive so as to monitor and measure directional overcurrent in the range of 0.01 to 1 amp. In some preferred embodiments of the present invention system, the relay devices are programmed to be highly sensitive so as to monitor and measure negative sequence overcurrent in the range of 0.01 to 1 amp. In some preferred embodiments of the present invention system, the relay devices are programmed to be highly sensitive so as to monitor and measure instantaneous undercurrent in the range of 0.1 to 2 amps.

In some preferred embodiments of the present invention system, the relay protection system includes sufficient software and hardware for recognizing breakage capacitive current within 20 milliseconds when the at least one operating condition falls outside of the preset parameter ranges, and communicating to open the circuit breaker on the broken line within another 20 milliseconds, thereby shutting down power to the broken line before it otherwise causes a ground fault or other short circuit.

In some preferred embodiments of the present invention system, the relay protection system includes a plurality of relay devices having phasors for monitoring all three phase voltages and currents and phase angle similarities and differences to detect capacitive current and deviations from preset ranges thereof.

In some preferred embodiments, the present invention systems and devices rely upon certain combinations of deviations from preset conditions to “call the alarm”, i. e., to signal trips to the breakers. This ensures that a single random deviation caused by a glitch does not unnecessarily close down a power line. AND gates are used to require condition A and condition B to be simultaneously showing deviations to allow the “alarm” to occur. OR gates, likewise, only require a single AND gate feed to trigger the breaker trip.

Thus, in a first group of gate embodiments of the present invention, there are at least two AND gates and at least one OR gate for processing monitored data readings and tripping breakers, including a first AND gate that receives line differential overcurrent readings and instantaneous undercurrent readings, and includes a second AND gate that receives negative overcurrent readings and instantaneous undercurrent readings.

Other groups of gate embodiments may also be used. Thus, in another group of gate embodiments, another AND gate or two may replace gates in some of the above-described gate groups or be added to them. Thus, the AND gates may include an AND gate that receives (a) undercurrent readings and (b) negative sequence current readings and/or an AND gate that receives (a) undercurrent readings and (b) negative sequence voltage readings.

Additional features, advantages, and embodiments of the invention may be set forth or apparent from consideration of the following detailed description, drawings, and claims. Moreover, it is to be understood that both the foregoing summary of the invention and the following detailed description are exemplary and intended to provide further explanation without limiting the scope of the invention as claimed.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The accompanying drawings, which are included to provide a further understanding of the invention and are incorporated in and constitute a part of this specification, illustrate preferred embodiments of the invention and together with the detail description serve to explain the principles of the invention. In the drawings:

FIG. 1 is a block diagram showing some of the features of a Prior Art high voltage electric transmission relay protection system;

FIG. 2 is a block diagram showing some of the features of a Present Invention high voltage electric transmission relay protection system that relies upon micro monitoring of highly sensitive line conditions—namely, one of which is instantaneous undercurrent, and the other of which is selected from (i) line differential overcurrent, (ii) negative sequence overcurrent, and (iii) combinations thereo.

FIG. 3 illustrates a diagram of a present invention protection system using two programmable relays located at opposing substations and monitoring at least two of the aforesaid conditions on all three lines (also referred to as wires, wire conductors, conductor wires or conductors herein) at both substations;

FIGS. 4 and 5 show high voltage transmission lines before a break and after a break (before shorting), respectively, with present invention relays (PIRs) at each substation;

FIGS. 6, 7 and 8 show various present invention AND gate/OR gate arrangements used to monitor conditions and initiate breaker tripping to prevent ground faults after a line break and before a line touches a tower, pole or ground;

FIG. 9 shows another alternative present invention system gate arrangement;

FIGS. 10 and 11 , respectively, illustrate Prior Art protection systems and Present Invention protection systems analysis for an actual 500 kilovolt, 1500 amp high voltage transmission line, and the phenomenal ability of the present invention system to completely eliminate collateral and catastrophic damage that is possible to occur with the Prior Art systems;

FIGS. 12 and 13 , respectively, illustrate Prior Art protection systems and Present Invention protection systems analysis for an actual 115 kilovolt, 100 amp high voltage transmission line, and the phenomenal ability of the present invention system to completely eliminate collateral and catastrophic damage that is possible to occur with the Prior Art systems.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

Electricity begins with production of power, i.e. the source, in the form of any electric-producing-facility, fossil fuel power plant, hydroelectric, wind farm, solar form, hybrid, co-generation, etc. When electricity is produced, it is next distributed and then consumed. The four major aspects are production, transmission, distribution and consumption. Transmission usually begins with high voltage (sometimes called high tension) lines transmitting from the source, through the lines, to the load. Distribution involves step-down substations with transformers and other components to regulate electric flow. It is well known that resistance will cause huge drops in delivered electricity to the load, and it is well known that the negative effect of resistance along the lines (wires) can be significantly reduced by lowering the current and increasing the voltage. As an example, a 110 volt line could lose over 70% of its value before reaching a load, depending upon line material and distance, whereas high voltage lines operating at very high voltages, such as 345 kilovolts, might lose only 0.5% of its value to the load over many miles. Large amounts of power can only be transmitted over long distances by very high and extremely high voltage transmission lines from a practical standpoint, otherwise resistive losses of energy are prohibitive.

For decades (at least 50 years), high voltage transmission systems have grown into significant sizes that are interconnected into what is called a grid, e.g. the North America grid. The grid is a mixture of different transmission voltages that is utilized because it is often used to share production resources in one region, taking power from one region and sending it to another region. One significant disadvantage is that a downed line or lines, on one segment or region of a grid, may cause other operating segments or regions to overload and shut down. Hence, the domino theory (one falls down and others follow sequentially) has applied to grids around the world, causing hundreds of thousands or even millions of consumers to lose power for significant periods of time.

To countermand these happenstances, grid reconfigurations, new equipment, new software, added redundancies and other support features have been added to the grid. In addition, line monitoring for short circuits, including ground faults, and shutting down circuits in response, is an integral part of high voltage (“HV”) transmission systems, also known as high voltage transmission systems.

Thus, for decades, programmable relays have been used to identify and respond to short circuits. The term “ground fault” as used herein, is meant to reference a disruption caused by a live wire or other live electric component unintentionally contacting a conductor, such as a conductive structure, the ground, a body of water, etc. The term “broken line” as used herein shall be taken broadly to include live wires, live connectors, live splices and splice components that have experienced a break in the circuity with a short or fault that has or is about to occur.

Referring now in detail to the drawings wherein like reference numerals designate corresponding parts throughout the several views, various embodiments of the present invention system are shown.

The standard in the industry is to monitor the transmission system to recognize a ground fault and to react to it. The conventional steps of the PRIOR ART are shown in FIG. 1 , block 1 (Prior Art High Voltage Electric Transmission Relay Protection Systems) are:

-   -   (1) deploy programmable, communicating relays along transmission         lines, block 3;     -   (2) program these relays to monitor macro changes in electric         conditions along the lines to identify when a ground fault has         occurred, block 5;     -   (3) communicate to the appropriate breaker to shut down the         breaker after the ground fault has occurred with possible         collateral damage and possible catastrophic damage, block 7;     -   (4) shift power as quickly as possible to by-pass (isolate) the         broken line to other transmission lines to minimize disruption,         block 9 (this occurs with existing equipment and grid         configurations as the transmission system reconfigures);     -   (5) locate the broken line and repair/replace it, block 11, and;     -   (6) restore power to the previously broken line, block 13.

This prior art procedure seems to be used frequently, if not universally, but has the disadvantage of collateral damage, from minor property, livestock or flora and fauna damage, to significant collateral damage-fires, destruction and the like, to catastrophic collateral damage-loss life or many lives, destruction of valuable property, such as in the millions or even hundreds of millions of dollars, and even destruction of entire communities.

The present invention is directed to the elimination of all collateral and catastrophic damage caused by a short or ground fault. This is achieved by utilizing micro monitoring programming in the relays to not look at ground faults, but to micro monitor small changes in capacitive current and capacitive voltage that occurs after a line is broken and before it shorts or grounds (that is, before it touches a tower, pole, ground or other grounding object). “Micro” as used herein does not mean one millionth or other exact measurement, but rather is intended to connote very small measurements on a relative basis. In this context, the present invention measurements are at least an order of magnitude smaller than present commercial relays measurements that occur upon a short or ground fault. For lower range high voltage systems, the present invention methods are monitoring conditions that are two or even three orders of magnitude smaller. Further, in the present invention methods, timing is critical and the conditions measured are different and critical. This unique approach enables breakers to be shut down (and hence cease electric flow) before any collateral damage could otherwise occur.

FIG. 2 shows the steps in the present invention ground fault prevention system with its high voltage transmission relay protection system, block 21, and preferred embodiments include these steps:

-   -   (1) deploy programmable, communicating relays along transmission         lines, preferably at or near the substations, block 23.         Communications must be very rapid, such as radio, and preferably         optical fiber communications;     -   (2) program these relays to monitor micro changes in electric         conditions, namely instantaneous undercurrent, and one other of         the aforesaid operating conditions, namely, selected from the         group consisting of a) line differential overcurrent; b)         negative sequence overcurrent and C) combinations thereof, along         the lines to identify when a line break has occurred and to do         so before the broken line creates a fault, block 25, (before it         touches a tower, pole or ground), e.g., within a half-second and         preferably within a few milliseconds;     -   (3) rapidly communicate to the appropriate breakers to shut down         the breakers at both ends of the break before the ground fault         has occurred, block 27 (again within a half-second and         preferably within a few milliseconds) to avoid collateral damage         or catastrophe, had the ground fault actually occurred;     -   (4) shift or by-pass (isolate) power as quickly as possible to         minimize disruption, block 29 (this occurs with existing         equipment and grid configurations as the transmission system         reconfigures);     -   (5) locate the broken line and repair/replace it, block 31, and;     -   (6) restore power to the previously broken line, block 33. Thus,         the present invention system includes the three-line         transmission subsystem, the communicating relay protection         subsystem and the communications subsystem.

By the present methods and devices, it can now be seen that the speed in which the monitoring and corrective action takes place is a fraction of a second or a second. Due to the present invention methods shut down before a fault occurs, no damage results and easier, safer and quicker broken line repair is achieved.

FIG. 3 illustrates a diagram of a present invention ground fault prevention system using two programmable relays located at opposing substations and monitoring at least two selected conditions. In one embodiment, these conditions are: a) instantaneous undercurrent, and b) line differential overcurrent. In another embodiment, these conditions are: a) instantaneous undercurrent, and b) negative sequence overcurrent. In another embodiment, these conditions are: a) instantaneous undercurrent, in combination with b) line differential overcurrent, as well as c) instantaneous undercurrent, in combination with d) negative sequence overcurrent. Another embodiment is a) instantaneous undercurrent, in combination with b) line differential overcurrent, as well as c) negative sequence overcurrent. Additional, conditions could be added, such as may be described below in conjunction with the gates.

One of these two relays is shown in greater detail than the other, but both are identical. In FIG. 3 , a structurally conventional relay device 50 is shown with a present-day relay microprocessor with computer software, hardware, and firmware that processes the software for adjusting the input parameters of the electric conditions, voltages and currents, to determine when adverse conditions occur. A second, identical relay 94 is also shown. These two relays 50 and 94 are programmed differently from normal relays used in the industry, as they are programmed to measure sensitive readings and not large readings, and, more specifically, are programmed to measure/monitor changes that occur before fault occurs. These “micro” changes relate to what occurs at the broken ends of a line before either end touches anything to short or ground. Such readings are bypassed, or ignored, by the prior art systems programming, as breakers are not tripped in the prior art systems until after the short or fault occurs. Here the aforementioned conditions are monitored and when they deviate from the preset acceptable operating ranges, the breakers are tripped. These relays send trip signals to the circuit breaker(s) within a second, and even within 20 or so milliseconds to de-energize the line. In preferred embodiments, the present invention relays are programmed to monitor in both directions (upstream and downstream from current flow) and trip both related breakers.

Table I lists the various components of the present invention protection system shown in FIG. 3 , and the detailed relationship of each component is set forth below Table I:

TABLE 1 FIG. 3 Present Invention System Components (Drawing Reference Number and Component) 50 Present Invention First Relay. 51 Three Phase Power Grid. 52 A phase transmission line conductor. 54 B phase transmission line conductor. 56 C phase transmission line conductor. 58 A phase potential transformer. 60 B phase potential transformer. 62 C phase potential transformer. 64 A phase current transformer. 66 B phase current transformer. 68 C phase current transformer. 70 Wire connecting 58 to relay 50 for A phase voltage input. (VA) 72 Wire connecting 60 to relay 50 for B phase voltage input. (VB) 74 Wire connecting 60 to relay 50 for C phase voltage input. (VC) 76 Wire connecting 64 to relay 50 for A phase current input. (IA) 78 Wire connecting 66 to relay 50 for B phase current input. (IB) 80 Wire connecting 68 to relay 50 for C phase current input. (IC) 82 Wire connecting ground to relay 50 for ground potential for use in relay 50. (GND) 84 Wire connecting the trip signal from Relay 50 to Circuit Breaker 86. 86 Circuit Breaker associated with the downed conductor detection system connected to Relay 50. 88 Circuit Breaker associated with the transmission line at the other end of the line, associated with the downed conductor detection system connected to Relay 94. 90 Communications port to send and receive data communications. 92 Communications port for testing Relay 50 and for making software changes and modifying relay settings. 94 Present Invention Second Relay. 96 Communication Center between Relays 50 and 94. 100 First Substation. 200 Second Substation (next downstream from First Substation.

The transmission lines of power grid 51 transport electric power to be delivered to meet customer demand. At the power generation end, a step-up transformer substation transmits the power through the transmission lines at very high voltages, and at the downstream end, a step-down transformer sends power through a distribution line at normal voltages. In between the beginning and end of a power grid, numerous intermediate substations are positioned to distribute power to local users. In this FIG. 3 , adjacent (First and Second) substations 100 and 200 are shown to be 50 miles apart. Relay 50 monitors the currents in electric power grid 51 on the specific transmission line associated with this specific transmission line linked to Relay 50 at First Substation 100. The power grid 51 transmission system is a three-phase system to transport power over long distances to safely and economically deliver energy to meet customer demand. The power grid 51 illustrated in this Figure is a three-phase alternating current system represented by transmission line conductors 52, 54, and 56. Relay 50 monitors or senses the current and voltage levels in each of the phases of the three-phase system. A circuit breaker 86 is provided for disconnecting the transmission line being protected from the power grid 51 when a conductor (wire) fails for any reason, such as a broken conductor (wire), a failed splice, gunshot damage, failed connectors or other components resulting in an open conductor condition.

Relay 50 receives input voltages from A, B, C phase potential transformers 58, 60, and 62 on transmission line conductors 52, 54, and 56, and the proportional values are connected to Relay 50 by wires 70, 72 and 74 to provide proportional voltage values to Relay 50 connections at VA, VB and VC, respectively.

Current levels on the transmission line conductors 52, 54, and 56 are performed by connecting a current transformer or some type of coupling capacitor voltage transformer, or other current sensing device to the line conductors 52, 54 and 56 at A, B, C phase current transformers 64, 66 and 68. The current flow output of A, B, C phase current transformers 64, 66 and 68 are directly proportional to the line currents in line conductors 52, 54 and 56. These current transformers 64, 66 and 68 are physically connected or magnetically coupled to each line as shown in the Figure. The primary windings of transformers 64, 66, and 68 are energized in accordance with the line currents in line conductors 52, 54, and 56, respectively. The secondary windings of the transformers 64, 66 and 68 are connected to Relay 50 via lines 76, 78 and 80, respectively at IA, IB and IC. Relay 50 is connected to the circuit breaker 86 via wire 84 connection at Relay 50 and terminating at the associated circuit breaker. This is commonly known as output contacts to perform the trip function located in the circuit breaker control cabinet. Wire 82 connects relay 50 to ground GND, as shown.

There is a second present invention Relay 94 at substation 200 with circuit breaker 88, that is 50 miles downstream from substation 100. Relay 94 is identical to Relay 50 and therefore its details are not repeated.

Relay 50 includes a communications port 90, such as a RS-485 serial port, or RS-232 or Fiber Optic connection which is used to transfer data to/from a remote location communications center 96 and as a direct link between Relay 50 at substation 100 of a transmission line, and, Relay 94 at the next substation 200 at the other end of the transmission line to communicate the status of the line from both ends. Relay 50 also includes a second communications port 92, such as a USB port which is provided for testing and local programming of Relay 50.

The relays 50 and 94 are coordinated by their programming and communications center 96. In these preferred embodiments, at a minimum each relay would monitor three lines for capacitive potential or capacitive current to recognize deviations from preset (programmed) acceptable operating ranges. More preferably, they each monitor three lines for a) instantaneous undercurrent, in combination with b) line differential overcurrent, and/or c) instantaneous undercurrent, in combination with d) negative sequence overcurrent, to recognize deviations from preset (programmed) acceptable operating ranges. In some preferred embodiments, the current magnitudes and phase angles are compared. Degree of phase synchronization may be determinative or contribute to the analysis to determine whether a significant enough deviation has occurred to trigger tripping breakers.

FIGS. 4 and 5 show high voltage transmission lines before a break and after a break (before shorting), respectively, with present invention relays (PIRs) at each substation. Both Figures are taken together in this discussion and identical components are identically numbered. A power generating station 211 generates three phase electricity transmitted by lines 203, 205 and 207 to step-up substation 209. Substation 209 has a present invention relay PIR 241 that functions in like fashion to relay 50 of FIG. 3 . The power is transmitted at high voltage over the three phase lines from tower 211 to subsequent towers 213, 219, 221, 223 and 225. There are large industrial consumers that draw from these lines such as factories 215 and 239. There are substations along the way, including substations 217, 227 and 237 and each has a Present Invention Relay 243, 245 and 247 respectively, such as described above in conjunction with relay 50 of FIG. 3 . The substations are step-down substations (with a step-down transformer to reduce voltage) that distribute power to users via conventional poles 231 and 233 to users such as school 229 and residence 235. Because the PIRs monitor upstream and downstream, when a line breaks (as shown in FIG. 5 between towers 219 and 221) the nearest upstream and downstream PIRs (243 and 245) monitoring the aforesaid conditions, will see deviant conditions generated from both ends of the break, and will direct a breaker tripping associated with those two substations (217 and 227) for the broken line before the broken line segments (ends) touch a tower or ground or other short. This happens in less than 25 milliseconds and completely prevents any short or ground from occurring and eliminates any collateral damage or worse-catastrophic damage to person, structure, animal, flora and fauna.

FIGS. 6, 7, 8 and 9 show various present invention AND gate/OR gate arrangements of the present invention systems, used to monitor conditions and initiate breaker tripping to prevent ground faults after a line break and before a line touches a tower, pole or ground. Identical components shown in each of these Figures are identically numbered.

In FIG. 6 , gate diagram 310, the preferred AND gate 307 and AND gate 309 are used to require a tripping signal directive 303 through OR gate 305. At AND gate 307, simultaneous deviations from preset ranges for line differential, block 315 and for undercurrent, block 317, are necessary for an action signal to pass through the gate. At AND gate 309, simultaneous deviations from preset ranges for directional overcurrent T-1, block 319 and for directional current T-2 317, block 321, are necessary for an action signal to pass through the gate. Once an action signal passes through one AND gate or the other AND gate, OR gate 305 sends the trip output directive 303 to trip the breakers.

In FIG. 7 , components shown in FIG. 6 are identically numbered here, except that there is a different AND gate 311. This is gate 311 illustrates a preferred embodiment of the present invention. Here at AND gate 311, simultaneous deviations from preset ranges for a directional overcurrent, block 323, and a negative sequence (current), block 325, are both required for an action signal to pass through AND gate 311.

In FIG. 8 , all that is shown in FIG. 6 is repeated and works the same way as in FIG. 6 , except that there is a third AND gate 313. Here at AND gate 313, simultaneous deviations from preset ranges for a negative sequence (voltage or current, preferably current), block 327, and an undercurrent, block 329, are both required for an action signal to pass through AND gate 313.

In FIG. 9 , all that is shown in FIG. 6 is repeated and works the same way as in FIG. 6 , except that there are now four AND gates, namely, AND gates 307, 309, 311 and 313 each functioning as set forth above in FIGS. 6, 7 and 8 .

While these gates assure reliability of the system by building redundancy into it, other variations for gate requirements within the various conditions monitored in the present invention may be alternatively be used without exceeding the scope of the present invention.

EXAMPLES 1 AND 2 Prior Art vs Present Invention Protection Systems—500 Kilovolts Transmission System

FIGS. 10 and 11 , respectively, illustrate Prior Art protection systems and Present Invention protection systems analysis for an actual 500 kilovolt, 1500 amp high voltage transmission line, and the significant ability of the present invention system to completely eliminate collateral and catastrophic damage that is possible or even likely to occur with the Prior Art systems.

In FIG. 10 , Example 1, the prior art system of shutting down power after a fault is identified, is shown in graphic format as current vs. time. (Note that as to all FIGS. 10 through 13 , the horizontal time segments and the vertical voltage segments are not intended to be proportional, only illustrative. The values in amps are accurate based on real conditions and calculations.) During t-1, the system is running with no breaks and hence has a normal average current of 1650 amps. At time t-2, a line breaks and current drops to approximately 100 amps. This when the broken line is falling but has not yet hit or touched a ground or short object, such as a tower or other structure or earth. This amperage stays at 100 until ground occurs at t-3, and then the current leaps to 3514 amps. This is enough to cause fires, destroy buildings and kill people, fauna and flora. (It is understood that any current/amperage hitting the ground could initiate a fire that could consequentially cause such damage.) At t-4, the breaker is tripped and current drops to 0, but it is too late as damage such as wildfires, has already occurred.

In FIG. 11 , Example 2, the present invention system of shutting down power before a fault occurs, is shown in graphic format as current vs. time. During t-1, the system is running with no breaks and hence has a normal average current of 1650 amps. At time t-2, a line breaks and current drops to approximately 100 amps. This when the broken line is falling but has not yet hit or touched a ground or short object, such as a tower or other structure or earth. This amperage stays at 100 until the present invention recognizes micro condition changes and trips the breakers, typically within 20 to 30 milliseconds, and thus, no ground occurs at t-3. The current remains at 0 amps. Because no fault or short occurs, all possibility to cause fires, destroy buildings and kill people, fauna and flora, are mitigated or eliminated. At t-4, the breaker has already been tripped and current remains at 0, until repair and restoration are completed, and then, the transmission is back to normal.

EXAMPLES 3 AND 4 Prior Art vs Present Invention Protection Systems—115 Kilovolts Transmission System

FIGS. 12 and 13 , respectively, illustrate Prior Art protection systems and Present Invention protection systems analysis for an actual 115 kilovolt, 100 amp high voltage transmission line, and the phenomenal ability of the present invention system to completely eliminate collateral and catastrophic damage that is possible to occur with the Prior Art systems. In these examples, FIGS. 12 and 13 are compared: At time t-1, the system is running normal and the current is 503 amps, when at time t-2, a line break occurs, the current in the broken line drops to about 0.8 amps. This when the broken line is falling but has not yet hit or touched a ground or short object, such as a tower or other structure or earth. This amperage stays at 0.8 and in the prior art Example 3, FIG. 12 , when the short or fault occurs, the current jumps to 7000 amps with potentially catastrophic consequences. In the present invention Example 4, still in the time frame of t-2, the present invention recognizes micro condition changes and trips the breakers, typically within 20 to 30 milliseconds, and thus, no ground occurs at t-3. The current remains at 0 amps. Because no fault or short occurs, all possibility to cause fires, destroy buildings and kill people, fauna and flora, are mitigated or eliminated. At t-4, the breaker has already been tripped and current remains at 0, until repair and restoration are completed, and then, the transmission is back to normal.

Although particular embodiments of the invention have been described in detail herein with reference to the accompanying drawings, it is to be understood that the invention is not limited to those particular embodiments, and that various changes and modifications may be affected therein by one skilled in the art without departing from the scope or spirit of the invention as defined in the appended claims. For example, the shapes of the various components herein may be changed; specific relays may be modified or enhanced; communications may be by radio or fiber optics or by any rapid communication system that is or becomes available. 

What is claimed is:
 1. A system for preventing ground fault or other short circuit in a three-phase electric transmission line system having at least three lines, caused by a break in a line, which utilizes at least dual high sensitivity monitoring, which comprises: A. a three-phase electric transmission system having at least three lines and a plurality of circuit breakers; B. a programmable relay protection system functionally connected to said three-phase electric transmission system, including a plurality of relay devices on each line of said electric transmission line system, said relay protection system being programmed to include: a) preset parameter ranges of at least two high sensitivity electric operating conditions, said preset ranges being acceptable operating parameter ranges, one of said operating conditions being instantaneous undercurrent, and one other of said operating conditions being selected from the group consisting of a) line differential overcurrent; b) negative sequence overcurrent and C) combinations thereof; b) monitoring means to monitor each line at each of said plurality of relay devices for said at least two operating conditions; c) permitting closed circuit operation when all of said lines show said at least two operating conditions are within said preset acceptable operating parameter ranges; d) sensing open conductor broken line changes and tripping a circuit breaker on a broken line when that line shows said at least two operating conditions are outside said preset parameter ranges; e) and completing the following steps B. and C. within 1.0 second; C. a communications system for communications between said relays and said circuit breaker such that when said relay protection system senses an open conductor broken line when said at least two operating conditions fall outside of said preset parameter ranges, communicating to open the circuit breaker on said broken line, thereby shutting down power to said broken line before it otherwise causes a ground fault or other short circuit.
 2. The system for preventing ground fault or other short circuit in a three-phase electric transmission line system of claim 1 wherein said plurality of relay devices on each line is programmed to monitor both upstream and downstream from each of said plurality of relay devices such that when a line is broken, the monitored operating conditions of both ends of the break are recognized and reported in the system to effect said shutting down power to said broken line by tripping two circuit breakers, one being upstream from the break and the other being downstream from the break.
 3. The system for preventing ground fault or other short circuit in a three-phase electric transmission line system of claim 1 wherein said programmable relay protection system plurality of relay devices are programmed to monitor line instantaneous undercurrent, and to monitor sensitive line differential overcurrents to detect current imbalance on line-charging capacitive current.
 4. The system for preventing ground fault or other short circuit in a three-phase electric transmission line system of claim 1 wherein said programmable relay protection system plurality of relay devices are programmed to monitor line instantaneous undercurrent, and to monitor and negative sequence overcurrent.
 5. The system for preventing ground fault or other short circuit in a three-phase electric transmission line system of claim 4 wherein step C. shutting down the power to said broken line is delayed by a preset time within the range of about 0.3 seconds to about 1 second to protect against a false shut down.
 6. The system for preventing ground fault or other short circuit in a three-phase electric transmission line system of claim 1 wherein said plurality of relay devices are programmed to be highly sensitive so as to monitor and measure differential overcurrent in the range of 0.01 to 0.1 amp.
 7. The system for preventing ground fault or other short circuit in a three-phase electric transmission line system of claim 1 wherein said plurality of relay devices are programmed to be highly sensitive so as to monitor and measure negative sequence overcurrent in the range of 0.01 to 1 amp.
 8. The system for preventing ground fault or other short circuit in a three-phase electric transmission line system of claim 1 wherein said plurality of relay devices are programmed to be highly sensitive so as to monitor and measure instantaneous undercurrent in the range of 0.1 to 2 amps.
 9. The system for preventing ground fault or other short circuit in a three-phase electric transmission line system of claim 1 wherein said plurality of relay devices are programmed to be highly sensitive so as to monitor and measure differential overcurrent in the range of 0.01 to 0.5 amp, and so as to monitor and measure instantaneous undercurrent in the range of 0.1 to 1 amp.
 10. The system for preventing ground fault or other short circuit in a three-phase electric transmission line system of claim 1 wherein said plurality of relay devices are programmed to be highly sensitive so as to monitor and measure differential overcurrent in the range of 0.01 to 0.5 amp, and so as to monitor and measure instantaneous undercurrent in the range of 0.1 to 1 amp.
 11. The system for preventing ground fault or other short circuit in a three-phase electric transmission line system of claim 1 wherein said plurality of relay devices are programmed to be highly sensitive so as to monitor and measure negative sequence overcurrent in the range of 0.01 to 0.5 amp, and so as to monitor and measure instantaneous undercurrent in the range of 0.1 to 1 amp.
 12. The system for preventing ground fault or other short circuit in a three-phase electric transmission line system of claim 1 wherein said relay protection system includes sufficient software and hardware for recognizing breakage capacitive current within 10 milliseconds when said at least one operating condition falls outside of said preset parameter ranges, and communicating to open the circuit breaker on said broken line within 10 milliseconds, thereby shutting down power to said broken line before it otherwise causes a ground fault or other short circuit.
 13. The system for preventing ground fault or other short circuit in a three-phase electric transmission line system of claim 1 wherein said relay protection system includes a plurality of relay devices having phasors for monitoring all three phase voltages and currents and phase angle similarities and differences to detect capacitive current and deviations from preset ranges thereof.
 14. The system for preventing ground fault or other short circuit in a three-phase electric transmission line system of claim 11 wherein there are at least two AND gates and at least one OR gate for processing monitored data readings and tripping breakers, including a first AND gate that receives line differential overcurrent readings and instantaneous undercurrent readings, and includes a second AND gate that receives negative sequence overcurrent readings and second instantaneous undercurrent readings. 